Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 October 2023 – 30 September 2024.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 927

Number of decisions: 1318

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
STEELE RAYMOND LLP 1 1
STEPHEN FIDLER & CO 1 1
STEPHEN MULLARKEY 1 1
STEPHEN RIMMER LLP 1 1
STEPHENS SCOWN LLP 6 3
STEPHENSONS SOLICITORS LLP 3 3
STERLING LAWYERS LTD 2 2
Sternberg Reed LLP 1 0
STEVE DAVIES SOLICITORS LTD 7 5
STEVENS & BOLTON LLP 2 0
STEWART LAW SOLICITORS 1 0
STILLWELLS LLP 1 1
STONE ROWE BREWER LLP 1 1
STOWE FAMILY LAW LLP 4 0
Stratega Law Limited 1 1
STRAW & PEARCE 1 1
STRIPES SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
SUMMERFIELD BROWNE LIMITED 1 0
SW19LAWYERS LLP 1 1
SWAN & DALE LLP 1 1
SWEENEY MILLER LLP 2 1
SWIFT LAWYERS LIMITED 1 0
SWITALSKIS SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 0
SYDNEY MITCHELL LLP 2 0
Syeds LawCare Solicitors 1 1
SYEDS LAWCARE SOLICITORS 2 2
SYEDS SOLICITORS 1 0
TAIT FARRIER GRAHAM LLP 1 1
TALBOTS LAW LTD 3 0
TALLENTS SOLICITORS 1 1
TANNA & CO SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
TAYLOR FORDYCE LIMITED 1 0
TAYLOR ROSE TTKW LIMITED 7 3
THACKRAY WILLIAMS LLP 2 1
THATCHER & HALLAM LLP 2 2
THE BIRMINGHAM LEGAL PARTNERSHIP LIMITED 1 0
THE BURNSIDE PARTNERSHIP SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
THE COMMUNITY LAW PARTNERSHIP LIMITED 1 1
THE ERIC WHITEHEAD PARTNERSHIP LIMITED 1 1
THE GPT LAW PRACTICE SOLICITORS 1 1
THE HETHERINGTON PARTNERSHIP LIMITED 1 1
THE J M PRACTICE LIMITED 2 0
THE JOHNSON PARTNERSHIP 2 1
THE LAW FIRM GROUP LTD 1 1
THE LAW HOUSE LIMITED 1 0
THE WILKES PARTNERSHIP LLP 1 1
The Will Associates Asset Management Ltd 1 0
THOMPSON SMITH AND PUXON 1 0
THOMPSONS SOLICITORS LLP 4 3
THOMSON SNELL & PASSMORE LLP 2 0
THORNES LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
THORNEYCROFT SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
THREE GRACES LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
THURNHILLS INC OAKEY CHARNLEY & THURNHILL 2 2
TILLY BAILEY & IRVINE LLP 1 0
TINKLER SOLICITORS 1 1
TINSDILLS SOLICITORS 1 0
TLSK SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
TOLHURST FISHER LLP 1 0
TOLLERS LLP 1 0
Toomey Legal Limited 2 2
TOZERS LLP 1 1
TRACEY MILLER FAMILY LAW LIMITED 1 0
TRADE UNION LEGAL LLP 1 1
TRENT LAW LIMITED 1 1
TRETHOWANS LLP 1 0
TUCKERS SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
TUDUR OWEN ROBERTS GLYNNE & CO 1 1
UK LAW 1 1
UNIVERSAL SOLICITORS 1 1
VANDERPUMP & SYKES LLP 2 0
VARDAGS LIMITED 1 1
VEALE WASBROUGH VIZARDS LLP 1 1
VELMA FERDINAND LIMITED 1 0
VICEROY LAW LIMITED 1 1
VIRGO CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD 3 3
VIRTUOSO LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
VLS SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 1
VYMAN SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
W A G Davidson & Co 1 1
W W & J MCCLURE 1 1
W W & J MCCLURE LTD 1 1
WADDINGTON LEGAL LIMITED 2 2
Wadsworths Solicitors Ltd 1 1
Wainwright & Cummins LLP 2 0
WAKE SMITH SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
WALKER FOSTER LIMITED 1 1
WALL JAMES CHAPPELL 1 0
WANNOPS LLP 2 1
WARDS SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
WARE & KAY SOLICITORS LTD 2 0
WARING & CO LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
WARINGS SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
WARNERS LAW LLP 1 0
Warwick Barker LLP 1 1
WATSON RAMSBOTTOM LIMITED 4 3
WEDLAKE BELL LLP 1 0
WEIGHTMANS LLP 2 2
WELCH & CO (SOLICITORS) LTD 1 1
WELLS BURCOMBE LLP 1 0

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case