Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 October 2023 – 30 September 2024.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 927

Number of decisions: 1318

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
Mr Warren Brian Bank 1 0
Mr Wayne Anthony Lewis 1 0
Mrs Carol Elaine Wright of Lammas Park Chambers 1 0
Mrs Grace Emily Holden of 3 PB Barristers 1 0
Mrs Kossar Kitching of Trinity Chambers 1 0
Mrs Lisa Jane Tuckwell of Trinity Chambers 1 0
Ms Camilla Khawaja 1 0
Ms Deborah Jane Hay of Chambers of Deborah Hay 1 1
Ms Esther Cantor 1 0
Ms Hala Mohamed Kamel Mustafa of Coram Chambers 1 0
Ms Neeta Amin 1 0
Ms Sheren Guirguis of Exchange Chambers 1 0
MSP LEGAL SERVICES LLP 4 4
MTG SOLICITORS 2 2
Mullis & Peake LLP 1 0
Murray Hay LLP 1 1
NALDERS LLP 2 1
NANTES SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
NAPTHENS LLP 1 0
NATIONAL LAWYER SERVICES 3 2
NELSON LEGAL LLP 1 0
NELSONS SOLICITORS LIMITED 5 3
NEWBOLD SOLICITORS 1 1
NEWMAN LAW LLP 1 1
NEWMANS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
NEWNHAM & JORDAN SOLICITORS LTD 2 2
NEWSTEAD & WALKER LIMITED 1 0
NEXA LAW LIMITED 1 0
NEXT GEN SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
NGA SOLICITORS 2 1
Nicholson Jones Sutton Solicitors Ltd 1 1
NIGEL BROADHEAD MYNARD 10 10
NLS SOLICITORS 1 1
NNE LAW LTD 1 1
NOBLE SOLICITORS 1 1
NOCKOLDS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
NORRIE WAITE & SLATER 1 1
NORTH FORD SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
NORTH YORKSHIRE LAW 1 1
NORTON CONNOR LIMITED 1 1
NR LEGAL SOLICITORS LIMITED 4 3
NUTTER & RICHARDS SOLICITORS 1 1
O'Hara Solicitors 1 1
O'NEILL PATIENT SOLICITORS LLP 4 3
Ocean Property Lawyers Ltd 1 0
OCL SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
OLDHAM MARSH PAGE FLAVELL 1 0
OLIVER & CO SOLICITORS LTD 2 2
OLLIERS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
OPTIMA LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 1 1
OPTIMAL CLAIM LIMITED 2 0
Optimal Solicitors Ltd 2 1
OSBORNES SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
OWEN WHITE & CATLIN LLP 1 1
PALMER AND PALMER SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
PALMER HODGSON & HEYES LIMITED 1 1
Palwasha Maria Heidar 1 1
PARACHUTE LAW LIMITED 1 0
PARDOES SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
Parfitt Cresswell 2 0
Parfitt Cresswell Limited 1 1
PARKINSON WRIGHT LLP 1 1
PARROTT & COALES LLP 1 1
PARRY AND WELCH SOLICITORS LLP 2 2
PARSONAGE & CO SOLICITORS 1 1
Patterson Law Limited 1 0
PATTERSON LAW LIMITED 1 0
PAUL BERG & TAYLOR 1 0
PAUL FINN SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
PAUL ROBINSON SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
PCB Lawyers LLP 2 0
PCS Legal Limited 12 9
Peacock & Co Solicitors Limited 1 0
Pearson Solicitors and Financial Advisers Ltd 1 0
PEGASUS LEGAL RESEARCH LIMITED 1 1
PENMANS SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
PENNINGTONS MANCHES COOPER LLP 1 0
PEPPERELLS LTD 1 0
PERCY SHORT & CUTHBERT LLP 2 2
Perduco Law Ltd 1 1
PERT & MALIM 1 1
PETER LYNN & PARTNERS 2 0
PETER PETER & WRIGHT 3 0
PG LEGAL LIMITED 4 4
PHILIPPOU & CO SOLICITORS 1 1
PHILLIPS SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 1
PICASSO LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
PICTONS SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
PINNEY TALFOURD LIMITED 1 0
PINNEY TALFOURD LLP 1 1
PLACIDI LAW COMPANY LIMITED 1 1
PLEASS THOMSON & COMPANY LIMITED 1 1
PM LAW LIMITED 1 1
PM PROPERTY LAWYERS LIMITED 2 2
POOLE ALCOCK LLP 1 1
PORTER & CO 1 1
PORTER DODSON LLP 1 1
PRAKTICE LEGAL 1 1
Premier Property Lawyers Limited 3 3
Premier Property Lawyers Ltd 2 2

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case