Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2024.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 921

Number of decisions: 1332

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
R A W Clark LLP 1 1
R T LAW 1 0
R.O.C.K SOLICITORS 1 1
RAINER HUGHES 1 0
RALLI SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
Ramsdens Solicitors LLP 1 0
RAMSDENS SOLICITORS LLP 2 1
RASHID & RASHID LAW FIRM 1 1
RAVI SETHI SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
RAY BORLEY DUNKLEY LLP 1 0
RAYDENS LTD TA RAYDENS SOLICITORS 1 0
READ ROPER & READ 1 0
Read Roper & Read Solicitors Limited 2 2
REDFERNS 1 1
REEMANS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
REEVES & CO SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
REGAL SOLICITORS (NW) LIMITED 1 1
RICHARD J KNAGGS & CO LLP 1 1
RICHARD MOSS SOLICITORS 2 1
RICHARD NELSON LLP 1 1
Richard Slade and Company Limited 1 1
RICHMOND ANDERSON GOUDIE PART OF THE RICHMOND PARTNERSHIP 1 1
RIDLEY AND HALL LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
RIGHT LEGAL GROUP LIMITED 1 1
RINGROSE LAW 1 1
RIX & KAY SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
RLE LAW PRACTICE LTD 1 1
RMNJ SOLICITORS 1 1
ROACH PITTIS SOLICITORS LIMITED 2 0
ROBERT LUNN & LOWTH LLP 1 0
ROBERTSONS LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
ROBYNS OWEN 1 0
ROCHE LEGAL LIMITED 1 1
RODGERS & BURTON 1 1
ROGER BROOKS & CO 1 1
RONALD FLETCHER BAKER LLP 2 1
ROSS & CO SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
ROTHERAS 1 0
Rotheras Solicitors LLP 1 1
ROTHWELL AND EVANS LIMITED 1 1
ROWBERRY MORRIS THAMES VALLEY LLP 1 0
ROWE RADCLIFFE 2 2
ROYDS WITHY KING LLP 1 0
ROYTHORNES LIMITED 2 1
RUDLINGS SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
RUSSELL - COOKE LLP 1 0
RUSSELL & RUSSELL SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
RUTTERS 1 0
S Z SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
Sanctuary Law Limited 1 1
SANDERS WITHERSPOON LLP 1 0
SANDHILL SOLICITORS 1 0
SARA BINNING SOLICITORS 1 1
SARAH WADDINGTON SOLICITORS LTD 4 4
SAUNDERS ROBERTS 1 1
SBP LAW 1 0
SCOTT REES & CO 2 2
SETFORDS LAW LTD 3 1
SETH LAW LIMITED 1 1
SHAKESPEARE MARTINEAU LLP 4 1
SHOOSMITHS LLP 1 1
SHORT RICHARDSON & FORTH SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
SIDNEY TORRANCE & CO 1 1
SILK FAMILY LAW LIMITED 1 1
SILKS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
SILLS & BETTERIDGE LLP 1 0
SIMONS RODKIN SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
SIMPSON MILLAR LLP 2 1
SINCLAIRSLAW LIMITED 2 1
SINTONS LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 1 0
SINTONS LLP 1 1
SKD LEGAL LTD 1 1
Slater and Gordon UK Limited 17 12
Slater Heelis Limited 1 1
SM Lawson Solicitors 1 1
Solstice Legal Services Limited 1 1
SONN MACMILLAN WALKER LIMITED 1 0
SOPHIE KHAN & CO LIMITED 1 1
SPARLING BENHAM & BROUGH 2 2
SPENCERS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
SPICKETTS BATTRICK LAW PRACTICE 3 3
SPIRE SOLICITORS LLP 1 0
SPRAKE & KINGSLEY LLP 1 1
SPRATT ENDICOTT LIMITED 1 0
ST HELENS LAW LIMITED 1 1
STANDLEY & CO 1 1
STANLEY HOUSE SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
STANLEY TEE LLP 2 2
STAR LEGAL (5) LIMITED 1 1
STAR LEGAL LIMITED 2 1
STEELE RAYMOND LLP 1 1
STEPHEN FIDLER & CO 1 1
STEPHEN MULLARKEY 1 1
STEPHEN RIMMER LLP 1 1
STEPHENS SCOWN LLP 7 3
STEPHENSONS SOLICITORS LLP 4 4
STERLING LAWYERS LTD 1 1
Sternberg Reed LLP 1 0
STEVE DAVIES SOLICITORS LTD 6 4
STEVENS & BOLTON LLP 2 0

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case