Ombudsman decision data

We publish data about the final decisions made by ombudsman.

Our Policy Statement sets out why we publish this information.

This data is updated on a rolling quarterly basis and most of our decisions will be published in the quarter after the decision was made.

Each decision remains published for 12 months from the date of publication.

Included in the table below are details of the ombudsman decisions made between 1 October 2023 – 30 September 2024.

The CSV file for this information can be found here.

How to use this information


General information

The information in the table below shows:

  • Name of the service provider.
  • Total decisions about the service provider in the last 12 months.

Click on the name to find the details of each complaint.



Choosing a service provider

This information can be used to look at the record of service providers. When you look at the information it's useful to ask:

  • Does a complaint mean the firm provides poor service?

No. It's important to check the data and see if we decided whether the service was reasonable or not.

Also take into account that everyone makes mistakes from time to time. When this happens it is important how the service provider responds to the complaint. The data will also show you whether we thought their own (first-tier) complaints handling process was reasonable or not. You should be able to find information about their complaints process on their website.

  • How big is the provider?

If a provider has more than one complaint with us, it could be because they are a big provider and deal with thousands of cases. In this situation it is not unusual for them to have a few complaints listed with us. Always look at the decision we make, not just the number of complaints.

  • What type of work do they do? 

We know that some legal work, such as personal injury, litigation and criminal work, can be more complex for people to understand and the outcomes might not be what people want. This means that complaints could be more likely, but always check what the outcome of the complaint was first.



Downloading data

If this information is used, for example on comparison sites, we encourage you to signpost to the Legal Ombudsman so consumers have the opportunity to find out more about the complaints data.

 


Please click on the green cross in the table below and this will give you more information about the legal service provider and the total decisions made in the last 12 months.

You will find the green cross in front of the name of the legal service provider.

In the table below, the ‘ombudsman remedy required’ field will be 0 if:

  • the ombudsman did not propose a remedy or

  • the remedy proposed by the ombudsman was equal to, or less than, the remedy offered by the firm before we investigated the complaint.

Where data says N/A, this means the ombudsman found the provider’s service to be reasonable.

Filter results by area of law

Number of firms: 927

Number of decisions: 1318

Name Number Of Decisions Ombudsman Remedy Required
MACHINS SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
MAJ LAW LIMITED 5 0
MAJORLAW LIMITED 1 1
MAKIN DIXON SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
MARK REYNOLDS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
MARSHALL HALL LEVY 1 1
Marshall Hall Levy Limited 1 0
MARTIN GAFFNEY LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 2 1
Mary Catherine Heery 1 0
MATINI MONTECRISTO LLP 3 1
MAXWELL HODGE LIMITED 1 1
MAYA & CO SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
MAYA LAW LTD 1 0
MAYO WYNNE BAXTER LLP 1 0
MB LEGAL SERVICES LIMITED 1 1
McCARTHY BENNETT HOLLAND SOLICITORS LLP 2 0
MCCUE JURY & PARTNERS LLP 1 1
MCGARRY & CO 1 0
MCMILLAN WILLIAMS 1 1
MCMILLAN WILLIAMS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
MEABY & CO SOLICITORS LLP 2 2
MEADOWS RYAN SOLICITORS LTD 1 1
MERCER LAW LTD 1 1
MERIT LEGAL LIMITED 1 0
METCALFE COPEMAN & PETTEFAR LLP 1 0
MEWIES SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 1
MFG SOLICITORS LLP 1 1
MFT SOLICITORS 1 1
MICHAEL LEIGHTON JONES SOLICITORS 1 1
MICHELMORES LLP 1 1
MIDDLESEX LAW CHAMBERS 1 1
MIDDLETON & UPSALL LLP 1 1
MILLS & REEVE LLP 2 1
MINAHAN HIRST & CO LIMITED 1 0
MINARDS PAVLOU 1 0
MINSTER LAW LIMITED 1 0
MIRKWOOD EVANS VINCENT LTD 1 1
Miss Catherine Eileen Hewitt of Quartz Barristers Chambers 1 0
Miss Lynne Shirley of Drystone Chambers 1 0
Miss Sharn Fiona Mardner of Bell Yard Chambers 1 0
Miss Sioned Davies of No5 Chambers 1 0
Miss Zoe Ann Rudd of Pump Court Chambers 1 0
MJW Law Limited 1 1
MLL Limited 4 2
MONACO SOLICITORS LTD 1 0
MOORE BARLOW LLP 5 3
Mordi & Co 1 1
Morr & Co LLP 1 1
MORTIMERS SOLICITORS LIMITED 1 0
MOSELEYS 1 1
Mr Andrew Akuafo Otchie of 12 Old Square Chambers 2 0
Mr Andrew Richard Clark of 9 St John Street 1 1
Mr Aneurin Brewer of Red Lion Chambers 1 0
Mr Benjamin Arthur Boucher-Giles of Fourteen 1 0
Mr Carl Amir-Ul Islam of Chambers of Ian Mayes QC 1 1
Mr Charles Christopher Holland of Trinity Chambers 1 0
Mr Christopher Edward Machin of Park Square Barristers 1 0
Mr Daniel Ceri Lewis of 3 Hare Court 1 1
Mr David Andrew Stockill of St Philips Chambers 1 1
Mr Gavin Hamilton of 3PB Barristers 1 0
Mr Gerard Pitt of Garden Court Chambers 1 1
Mr Haresh Sood of Haresh Sood Law Chambers Ltd 1 0
Mr Hermann Boeddinghaus of 4 Stone Bldgs 1 0
Mr Jacob Taylor of Doughty Street Chambers 1 0
Mr James David Bruce of The 36 Group 1 0
Mr James Francis Gibbons of Three Stone 1 0
Mr James Fraser Oliveira-Agnew of Lamb Building Chambers Limited 1 1
Mr James Thomas Colin Holmes of Garden Court Chambers 1 0
Mr James Wing of 3 Temple Gardens 1 1
Mr Jeremy Patrick Wainwright of 3 Temple Gardens 1 0
Mr Jeremy Richard Dable of Normanton Chambers 1 0
Mr John Edward Gerard Hudson of Quartz Barristers Chambers 1 1
Mr John McLanachan 10 10
Mr Jonathan Paul Dale of 18 St John Street 1 0
Mr Joseph Christopher Switalski of 29 Bedford Row Chambers 1 0
Mr Kieran Michael Joseph O'Neill of Trinity Chambers 1 1
Mr Liam Michael Ryan of 7BR 1 0
Mr Mark Adrian Symes of Garden Court Chambers 1 0
Mr Mashood Iqbal of 10 King's Bench Walk 1 0
Mr Michael Mulkerrins of Erimus Chambers 1 0
Mr Nicholas John Elcombe of East Anglian Chambers 1 0
Mr Nigel Simon Brockley of No5 Chambers 1 1
Mr Patrick John Harrington 1 1
Mr Paul Antony Turner 1 1
Mr Paul Harris of Cornwall Street Barristers 1 0
Mr Paul Ivan William Wilmshurst of New Square Chambers 1 0
Mr Peter Michael Wilkinson of 3DJB 1 0
Mr Peter Woodall 1 1
Mr Philip Anthony Sapsford of 4-5 Gray's Inn Square 1 0
Mr Philip Howard Davy 1 0
Mr Reginald Leon Arkhurst 1 1
Mr Richard Henry Norman of St John's Chambers 1 0
Mr Robert James Sheridan of Colleton Chambers 1 0
Mr Robert James Trevis of Queen Square Chambers 1 0
Mr Roderick Spinks 1 0
Mr Simon Jeremy Gerhard Crabtree of St Johns Buildings 1 0
Mr Stephen Sijia Du of 7 King's Bench Walk 1 0
Mr Stephen Vullo 1 0
Mr Steven Jeremy Woolf of Gatehouse Chambers Limited 1 0
Mr Timothy George Christie Becker 2 1

If you cannot see any information relating to a decision you have selected above, the ombudsman decided that no remedy was required in the case